EA just scored a big win in Austria’s Higher Regional Court, which ruled that Football Ultimate Team (FUT) packs don’t count as gambling. The decision tackles an ongoing debate about loot boxes and whether buying packs for random in-game rewards is like gambling. According to the court, since players buy these packs to use in FIFA/EAFC, not to make money, there’s no economic risk and no gambling involved.
According to GameIndustry.biz, the court’s ruling is based on Austria’s definition of gambling, which requires both economic risk and the intent to profit. Because players use FUT packs purely for gameplay, the court saw no financial risk. Plus, FIFA/EAFC itself is considered a game of skill, not chance, so the packs fit into that category.
This decision stands out because lower Austrian courts have given mixed rulings on loot boxes before. Now, with a higher court weighing in, this could set the tone for similar cases down the line.
EA is thrilled with the outcome, calling it a “direction-setting decision.” In a statement, EA said, “We design our games to bring choice, fairness, value, and fun, and we are pleased with the court’s findings that FUT packs are not gambling and that players generally do not acquire them to make a profit, but simply as part of the game.” They also emphasized that spending is optional, and most players don’t spend on these packs.
This ruling gives EA some breathing room in Europe’s ongoing loot box debate. While some players argue that loot boxes resemble gambling, this decision highlights that courts may see them as just another part of the gaming experience. For players and developers, it’s a reminder that legal views on in-game purchases are still taking shape and may vary by country.
